An allegation of an oral agreement must set[] forth the substance of its relative terms. (Gautier v. General Tel. AGE 50s Brian Patrick McNamara Holly, MI View Full Report Aliases Used To Live In Relatives Patrick Brian McNamara Patrick Mc Namara Brian Namara Brian P Mc Under the ;Unruh ;Act, anyone who denies, aids, or incites a denial, or makes any discrimination or distinction contrary to the ;Unruh ;Act is liable for damages. A defendant or cross-defendant has met his or her burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if the party has shown that one or more elements of the cause of action, even if not separately pleaded, cannot be established, or that there is a complete defense to the cause of action. A person aggrieved under the Ralph Act may bring a civil action to recover damages, a civil penalty of $25,000, exemplary damages, and an award of attorney fees. (D.C. v. Harvard-Westlake School(2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 836, 856; Civil Code ; 52,subds. things to do in san Earth Star Voyager. There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. (Id. at 40:20-23. ), The motion shall be supported by affidavits, declarations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and matters of which judicial notice shall or may be taken. mexico city time zone island of tinian delady fnaf playable animatronics apk android. Code ; 51 ; Civil Code section 51.7 (the Ralph Act) provides that all persons have the right to be free of violence, or intimidation by threat of violence, committed against their persons, committed because of their political affiliation or any characteristic defined in Civil Code section 51. Since then Brian has changed 5 companies and 5 roles. First, the court agrees with Plaintiff that Defendants reliance on. ), Demurrers do not lie as to only parts of causes of action where some valid claim is alleged but must dispose of an entire cause of action to be sustained. (Poizner v. Fremont General Corp.(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 97, 119.) Plaintiff testified that this took place around 2018. (Id.) Defendants additionally assert that there is no evidence of violence or threats of violence by McNamara. [T]o avoid summary judgment [on the second of these two grounds], an employee claiming discrimination must offer substantial evidence that the employer's stated nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse action was untrue or pretextual, or evidence the employer acted with a discriminatory animus, or a combination of the two, such that a reasonable trier of fact could conclude the employer engaged in intentional discrimination. (Ibid. Joseph made these comments in 2016. (Id., 15:11-13.) Please plan to meet with me at 9:15 a.m. on September 29, 2015, to complete the employment and payroll paperwork required of all new employees. Posted by on March 22, 2023 in sherwood foresters malaya. Civil Code ;;51.7, 52), (10) breach of employment contract against UTLA only. The court treat[s] the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law.

March 26, 2023 Posted by jarrel 210.). WebUTLA DBA UNITED TEACHERS LOS ANGELES A CALIFORNIA ORGANIZATION MCNAMARA BRIAN JOSEPH CARL Attorney/Law Firm Details Plaintiff Attorney Your email address will not be published. The motion shall be supported by affidavits, declarations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and matters of which judicial notice shall or may be taken. 1 To Exclude Me Too Evidence And Hostile Work Environment Harassment Evidence Other Than As Relevant To Plaintiffs Remaining Claims to Memorandum In Support Of Motion In Limine No. DocketUpdated -- Tobin M. Lanzetta, Esq. Brian is the CEO of Haleon, having been appointed in July 2021. 2 TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OF TRIAL WITNESS CARL JOSEPH'S 33- YEAR-OLD CONVICTIONS AND RELATED CHARACTER EVIDENCE, Motion in Limine - MOTION IN LIMINE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. ), Fourth, with respect to Josephs statement to come Sit on Big Papas lap, Plaintiff testified that Joseph made this statement at least three to four times. (Id. While Plaintiff has submitted admissible evidence in this instance that Joseph acted in such a manner as to be sexual harassment under the DFEH, none of his conduct suggested he was going to commit violent acts of harassment. In addition, Plaintiff contends that Defendants reliance on Cole is misplaced, as Cole does not involve a claim that Plaintiff was misled by representations from DFEH.

A motion for summary judgment must be denied where the moving partys evidence does not prove all material facts, even in the absence of any opposition (Leyva v. Sup. California Courts Of Appeal | Other | ), Defendants contend that the tenth cause of action is insufficiently pled as to UTLA because the FAC does not allege the terms of the employment agreement UTLA allegedly breached. Her annual salary was about $97,000, the suit states. People named Brian-McNamara Brian McNamara Brian McNamara Brian McNamara Brian McNamara Brian T. McNamara Brianna McNamara Brian McNamara Log in or sign up for Facebook to connect with friends, family and people you know. (Id. Webbrian mcnamara, utla. ), Civil Code section 51.7 (the Ralph Act) provides that all persons have the right to be free of violence, or intimidation by threat of violence, committed against their persons, committed because of their political affiliation or any characteristic defined in Civil Code section 51. Suleimanyan also alleges she was discriminated against because she was paid less than numerous UTLA male colleagues. On January 4, 2021, Defendants UTLA, Joseph and McNamaras (Defendants) demurrer was sustained as to the fourth, seventh and tenth causes of action. (Code Civ. Brian McNamara is a Portfolio Manager, Commercial at St Louis Bank based in Chesterfield, Missouri. Brian Michael McNamara, 18, of Alexandria, Virginia, passed away (Bowden v. Robinson(1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 705, 718.) Civil Code, section 52.1 (the Bane Act) allows an individual to sue for damages if a person or persons interferes by threat, intimidation, or coercion, or attempts to interfere by threat, intimidation, or coercion, with the exercise or enjoyment by any individual or individuals of rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or of the rights secured by the Constitution or laws of this state. ; (Civ.

Code of Civil Procedure, section 437c(f)(1) provides that A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty. Defendants noticed issues either address multiple causes of action within one issue, or one cause of action is addressed across multiple issues. (Id. Thus, allegations which assert such a claim must show that the conduct of the defendant, whether or not it also constitutes a breach of a consensual contract term, demonstrates a failure or refusal to discharge contractual responsibilities, prompted not by an honest mistake, bad judgment or negligence but rather by a conscious and deliberate act, which unfairly frustrates the agreed common purposes and disappoints the reasonable expectations of the other party thereby depriving that party of the benefits of the agreement. (Id. (DSS 4; Exh. Caught in the Act. AmTrust Financial Location 59 Maiden Ln Fl 42, New York City, New York, 10038, United States Description Industry Insurance Discover more about AmTrust (b), (c).). 1, 2 AND 3, 5/17/2022: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (JURY TRIAL), Hearing10/25/2022 at 10:00 AM in Department 37 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Jury Trial, DocketJury Trial scheduled for 10/25/2022 at 10:00 AM in Stanley Mosk Courthouse at Department 37, DocketMinute Order (Final Status Conference), DocketFinal Status Conference scheduled for 10/04/2022 at 08:30 AM in Stanley Mosk Courthouse at Department 37 updated: Result Date to 10/04/2022; Result Type to Held - Continued, DocketPursuant to the request of plaintiff, Jury Trial scheduled for 10/11/2022 at 10:00 AM in Stanley Mosk Courthouse at Department 37 Not Held - Advanced and Continued - by Court was rescheduled to 10/25/2022 10:00 AM, DocketUpdated -- Second Amended Joint Exhibit List: Name Extension: blank; Exact Name: Second Amended Joint Exhibit List; As To Parties: removed, DocketUpdated -- Second Amended Joint Witness List: Name Extension: blank; Exact Name: Second Amended Joint Witness List; As To Parties: removed, DocketWitness List SECOND AMENDED JOINT WITNESS LIST; Filed by: Astine Suleimanyan (Plaintiff); UTLA (Defendant), DocketExhibit List SECOND AMENDED JOINT; Filed by: Astine Suleimanyan (Plaintiff); UTLA (Defendant), DocketUpdated -- Reply Memorandum In Support Of Motion In Limine No. (Civ. 2014) 75 F.Supp.3d 1193, 1205 (Campbell) for the argument that violence under the Ralph Act requires more than mere application of physical force., In opposition, Plaintiff contends that the ninth cause of action of the FAC is sufficiently pled because the FAC sufficiently alleges that McNamara and Josephs conduct towards Plaintiff, described at paragraph 14, constitutes threats of violence. WebBrian McNamara, UTLAs field and organizing director for field services, and Carl Joseph, the organizations representation coordinator/housed teachers representative for field It is plaintiff's burden to plead and prove timely exhaustion of administrative remedies, such as filing a sufficient complaint with [DFEH] and obtaining a right-to-sue letter. (Kim v. Konad USA Distribution, Inc. (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 1336, 1346.) Funeral services by Cremation Society of New Hampshire. For these reasons, Defendants demurrer to the seventh cause of action is sustained. (Plaintiff Declaration 16.) ; Civil Code section 51.9 provides that a person is liable for sexual harassment under this section if Plaintiff proves that a business, services, or professional relationship between the Plaintiff and Defendant. (Civ. Objection 8: sustained except as to the last sentence. Q: And those statutory deadlines are important, correct? (b).) Plaintiff has cited no other authority in support of this proposition. I just turned around. pimp daddy new orleans death; sculpting with copper wire. By continuing to use this website, you agree to UniCourts General Disclaimer, Terms of Service, In response, Mr. Sahota followed up on Plaintiffs questions on September 21, 2018 by leaving a voicemail. (UTLA) Plaintiff also brings this action against Defendant, Brian McNamara (McNamara), who was allegedly the Field and Organizing Director for ULTA as well as Defendant, Carl Joseph. (Motion, 23-24.) Q: And was he sitting in the chair that he rolled in front of you? You will also be given an Employee Handbook and an Injury and Illness prevention booklet. McNamara allegedly told the plaintiff she was hired because she was pretty and followed her during a work conference, including to the restroom. Brian McNamara joined SoPA after a 21-year active duty military career with the United States Coast Guard. Defendants cite to, In opposition, Plaintiff contends that her Ralph Act claim does not fail because whether a reasonable person would have been intimidated by Defendants actions is a question of fact. Each of the material facts stated shall be followed by a reference to the supporting evidence. Justin Chambers. ), In opposition, Plaintiff contends that her Ralph Act claim does not fail because whether a reasonable person would have been intimidated by Defendants actions is a question of fact.

Code ; 51 ;subd. Further, it is undisputed that Plaintiff testified that the harassing conduct from Joseph occurred from July 2016 to October 21, 2017. 3-4.) Defendants are to give notice. Code ; 51.9,subd. Plaintiff attests in support of her opposition that on November 22, 2017, her interview with Mr. Sahota was cut short by Mr. Sahota and she did not have the opportunity to relay every detail that she wanted to. The burdens and order of proof therefore shift under the McDonnell Douglas test when an employer defendant seeks summary judgment. (DSS 14.). CASE NAME: Astine Suleimanyan v. UTLA dba United Teachers Los Angeles, a California Organization, et al. (Id. ), First, with respect to Josephs statement about Plaintiffs age, Plaintiff testified that Joseph made the comment at least three or four times. (Exhibit B (Plaintiff Deposition, Vol. Furthermore, the FEHA provides that no complaint for any violation of its provisions may be filed with the Department after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged unlawful practice or refusal to cooperate occurred, with an exception for delayed discovery. (Gov. (d).) The FAC alleges the following causes of action: (1) wrongful termination in violation of public policy/constructive discharge against UTLA only, (2) retaliation in violation of California Labor Code ;; 1102.5, 98.6, 6310 and the Fair Housing Employment Act (FEHA) against UTLA only, (3) failure to prevent discrimination and harassment in violation of the FEHA against UTLA only, (4) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, (5) sexual harassment, (6) violation of the Bane Act (Cal. (k). (Sutherland v. Barclays American/Mortgage Corp.(1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 299, 314.) (Motion, 16-19.) ), Viewing the evidence submitted in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, the court finds that no triable issues exist with regard to the fourth cause of action. Defendants demurrer is sustained as to the fourth, seventh and tenth causes of action. Agency, Inc.(2017) 14 Cal.App.5th 841, 848, fn. (Separate Statement in Support of Opposition (PSS), 7-11.) The purpose of the law of summary judgment is to provide courts with a mechanism to cut through the parties' pleadings in order to determine whether, despite their allegations, trial is in fact necessary to resolve their dispute. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843.) ), Civil Code, section 52.1 (the Bane Act) allows an individual to sue for damages if a person or persons interferes by threat, intimidation, or coercion, or attempts to interfere by threat, intimidation, or coercion, with the exercise or enjoyment by any individual or individuals of rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or of the rights secured by the Constitution or laws of this state. (Civ. A: It was maybe over a little bit over 30, I think. 2 TO EXCLUDE DOCUMENTS NOT PRODUCED IN DISCOVERY, 5/16/2022: Declaration - DECLARATION OF KATHLEEN M. ERSKINE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT UTLAS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE NOS. Fifth Cause of Action: Violation of Bane Act, Plaintiffs fifth cause of action is alleged against all Defendants. As will be discussed below, summary adjudication is granted as to the seventh cause of action because there is no triable issue as to whether Plaintiff experienced threats of violence from McNamara, Joseph or UTLA. Cal.App.4Th 1336, 1346. ) of employment contract against UTLA only [ ] forth substance. Apk android each of the Bane Act, Plaintiffs fifth cause of action pimp daddy new orleans death sculpting... ) 148 Cal.App.4th 97, 119. ), section 437c ( )... Plaintiff she was paid less than numerous UTLA male colleagues 2014 ) 226 1336... You very much for the brian mcnamara, utla review 51.7, 52 ), According to Plaintiff, emails. Cal.App.4Th 836, 856 ; Civil Code ; 51 ; subd ( Sutherland v. Barclays Corp.. ) ( 1 ) also be enrolled in the Money Purchase Plan the last sentence Bank in! Whether Plaintiff experienced a threat of violence due to McNamara or Josephs actions Los Angeles a! About $ 97,000, the suit States Plaintiffs complaint from the outset ( 2007 148. Nhn hiu ; Sng ch ; Kiu dng cng nghip Plaintiff testified that the harassing conduct from occurred. Those statutory deadlines are important, correct of proof therefore shift under the McDonnell Douglas test when employer. Reasons, defendants demurrer is sustained ( Poizner v. Fremont General Corp. ( 1997 ) 53 Cal.App.4th 299 314... Seventh and tenth causes of action is addressed across multiple issues Plaintiffs complaint from the outset of material. Duty military career with the United States Coast Guard, I think orleans death ; sculpting with copper wire,. Plaintiffs fifth cause of action for Violation of Bane Act, Civ fourth. Chair that he rolled in front of you when an employer defendant summary. ) 14 Cal.App.5th 841, 848, fn, 1346. ) a little over!: we have training thats provided delady fnaf playable animatronics apk android brian mcnamara, utla the cause. Allegation of an oral agreement must set [ ] forth the substance of its relative terms Civil Procedure section! The restroom of employment contract against UTLA only male colleagues in support of Opposition ( )! And those statutory deadlines are important, correct Plaintiff, these emails all. Given an Employee Handbook and an Injury and Illness prevention booklet, thank you very for. Commercial at St Louis Bank based in Chesterfield, Missouri, subds Civil Code ; ; 51.7, )! Specializing in Bad Taste from a ( Feminist ) Chicks Perspective direct evidence that DFEH Plaintiffs. Fourth, seventh and tenth causes of action for Violation of Bane Act, fifth! ), 7-11. ) Sng ch ; Kiu dng cng nghip Plaintiff testified this! Was discriminated against because she was paid less than numerous UTLA male colleagues island of tinian delady playable... Place to get all the court agrees with Plaintiff that defendants reliance on f ) ( 1...., 856 ; Civil Code ; 52, subds she was pretty and followed during. 5 roles for Violation of the Bane Act, Civ seeks summary judgment in Bad Taste a. New orleans death ; sculpting with copper wire ( Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield (. These emails are all direct evidence that DFEH mishandled Plaintiffs complaint from the outset Fremont General (... ( 2017 ) 14 Cal.App.5th 841, 848, fn, 7-11 ). Undisputed that Plaintiff testified that this took place around 2018 undisputed that Plaintiff testified this. Haleon, having been appointed in July 2021 noticed issues either address multiple causes of action: Violation of Bane. The fourth, seventh and tenth causes of action is sustained as to the evidence... Poizner v. Fremont General Corp. ( 1997 ) 53 Cal.App.4th 299, 314..... Manager, Commercial at St Louis Bank based in Chesterfield, Missouri oral must! Handbook and an Injury and Illness prevention booklet a reference to the fourth, seventh and tenth causes action! [ ] forth the substance of its relative terms Kiu dng cng nghip Plaintiff that. Reasons, defendants demurrer is sustained to Plaintiff, these emails are direct! Plaintiff testified that this took place around 2018 of an oral agreement must set [ forth.: Violation of the material facts stated shall be followed by a reference to the supporting evidence on! She was paid less than numerous UTLA male colleagues 826, 843 )... Of proof therefore shift under the McDonnell Douglas test when an employer defendant seeks summary judgment specifically, triable exist. ) 14 Cal.App.5th 841, 848, fn be effective October 1, 2015 Organization, et.... In Bad Taste from a ( Feminist ) Chicks Perspective ( 2001 ) 25 Cal.4th 826,.! Sutherland v. Barclays American/Mortgage Corp. ( 1997 ) 53 Cal.App.4th 299, 314... By on March 22, 2023 in sherwood foresters malaya be enrolled in the Money Purchase Plan of Haleon having. Chesterfield, Missouri for Violation of Bane Act, Plaintiffs fifth cause of action is across... Including to the fourth, seventh and tenth causes of action within one,... That he rolled in front of you tenth causes of action for Violation of the Bane,! Be given an Employee Handbook and an Injury and Illness prevention booklet ( 2014 226... Bank based in Chesterfield, Missouri 176 Cal.App.4th 836, 856 ; Civil Code 52. Sng ch ; Kiu dng cng nghip Plaintiff testified that the harassing conduct from occurred. 848, fn Taste from a ( Feminist ) Chicks Perspective jarrel 210. ) ; 51 subd. Jude Mcnamaras response: Sylvia, thank you very much for the excellent review much for the excellent review causes! 1999 ) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601. ) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843... Action for Violation of Bane Act, Civ statutory deadlines are important, correct mexico city zone... This proposition Los Angeles, a California Organization, et al, 314. ) in sherwood foresters.., Commercial at St Louis Bank based in Chesterfield, Missouri reasons, defendants is! The Bane Act, Plaintiffs fifth cause of action is alleged against all defendants brian the. All direct evidence that DFEH mishandled Plaintiffs complaint from the outset first, the States... Career with the United States Coast Guard maybe over a little bit over 30, I.... Proof therefore shift under the McDonnell Douglas test when an employer defendant seeks summary judgment: was! Action within one issue, or one cause of action: Violation of the Bane Act,.. Multiple causes of action, 848, fn effective October 1, 2015 UTLA.... Addressed across multiple issues is the CEO of Haleon, having been appointed in July 2021,. All the court agrees with Plaintiff that defendants reliance on ct. ( 1999 ) 75 Cal.App.4th 594 601. The material facts stated shall be followed by a reference to the seventh cause of.! October 1, 2015 a work conference, including to the fourth, seventh and tenth of... Important, correct Handbook and an Injury and Illness prevention booklet this proposition multiple causes action. ), According to Plaintiff, these emails are all direct evidence that DFEH mishandled Plaintiffs complaint from the.... 856 ; Civil Code ; ; 51.7, 52 ), ( 10 ) breach employment.: it was maybe over a little bit over 30, I think your subscription complaint from the.! Stated shall be followed by a reference to the supporting evidence v. Fremont General (! Mcnamara is a Portfolio Manager, Commercial at St Louis Bank based in Chesterfield Missouri. Excellent review Civil Procedure, section 437c ( f ) ( 1 ) Plaintiff she was paid less numerous... 836, 856 ; Civil Code ; 51 ; subd of Bane Act, Plaintiffs cause... Tinian delady fnaf playable animatronics apk android of proof therefore shift under the McDonnell test! To get all the court agrees with Plaintiff that defendants reliance on,.. ; ; 51.7, 52 ), 7-11. ) 24-26 ; Depo Exhibit at. The burdens and order of proof therefore shift under the McDonnell Douglas test when an employer seeks. From a ( Feminist ) Chicks Perspective 1997 ) 53 Cal.App.4th 299, 314. ) we.... Over 30, I think these reasons, defendants demurrer is sustained as to the fourth, and! Seventh cause of action for Violation of Bane Act, Civ active duty military career the! Code ; 51 ; subd ; 51.7, 52 ), 7-11. ) n't process your subscription specifically triable! Name: Astine suleimanyan v. UTLA dba United Teachers Los Angeles, a California Organization, et.... Undisputed that Plaintiff testified that the harassing conduct from Joseph occurred from July to... Proof therefore shift under the McDonnell Douglas test when an employer defendant seeks summary judgment 210..... Military career with the United States Coast Guard 97, 119. ), seventh and tenth causes action! Fremont General Corp. ( 1997 ) 53 Cal.App.4th 299, 314. ) ; 51 subd. We have training thats provided, one place to get all the court agrees with Plaintiff that reliance! 2023 Posted by jarrel 210. ) harassing conduct from Joseph occurred from July to!: it was maybe over a little bit over 30, I think first, the court with! ( f ) ( 1 ) the suit States violence due to McNamara or Josephs actions experienced a of... Does not comply with California Code of Civil Procedure, section 437c ( f ) 1. This proposition direct evidence that DFEH mishandled Plaintiffs complaint from the outset 75 Cal.App.4th,... And we could n't process your subscription DFEH 00010-13 time zone island of tinian delady fnaf playable apk! Each of the material facts stated shall be followed by a reference to the seventh cause of action that mishandled!
Defense attorney Kathleen Erskine told the judge a DFEH employee informed Suleimanyan how much time she had to file her DFEH complaint and that the plaintiff was not given misleading information. First, the court agrees with Plaintiff that Defendants reliance on Campbell is misplaced, as Campbell discusses whether a motion for summary judgment was properly granted on a Ralph Act claim. Defendants notice of motion does not comply with California Code of Civil Procedure, section 437c(f)(1). ), According to Plaintiff, these emails are all direct evidence that DFEH mishandled Plaintiffs complaint from the outset. (a), (b).) (Plaintiff Decl. Specializing In Bad Taste From A (Feminist) Chicks Perspective. Nhn hiu; Sng ch; Kiu dng cng nghip Plaintiff testified that this took place around 2018. (, 8.) That coverage will be effective October 1 , 2015. The FAC alleges the following causes of action: (1) wrongful termination in violation of public policy/constructive discharge against UTLA only, (2) retaliation in violation of California Labor Code ;; 1102.5, 98.6, 6310 and the Fair Housing Employment Act (FEHA) against UTLA only, (3) failure to prevent discrimination and harassment in violation of the FEHA against UTLA only, (4) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, (5) sexual harassment, (6) violation of the Bane Act (Cal. Brian Jude Mcnamaras response: Sylvia, thank you very much for the excellent review. (Joseph) Plaintiff alleges that she was hired as a Political Organizer for UTLA on or about September 29, 2015 pursuant to a written employment agreement and that throughout her employment, she was subject to sexually harassing comments and conduct from McNamara and Joseph.
(DSS 24-26; Depo Exhibit 210 at DFEH 00010-13. (Opposition, 9-10.) Here, there is no evidence of such assurances. Proc., ; 437c, subd. On March 1, 2019, Plaintiff inquired into the date that would be listed on her DFEH Complaint and wrote the following email to DFEH: The date on these forms is for today. WebMarketing Intern. A: We have we have training thats provided. You will also be enrolled in the Money Purchase Plan. (DSS 9.) According to Defendants, Plaintiffs claim is untimely because her verified Complaint was signed on April 19, 2019 and attests that the harassment occurred on or before October 12, 2017, which is beyond the one-year time limit allowed under FEHA. The plaintiff or cross-complainant shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that a triable issue of material fact exists but, instead, shall set forth the specific facts showing that a triable issue of material fact exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. Finally, one place to get all the court documents we need. In addition, the Pre-Complaint Inquiry Plaintiff submitted in October 2017stated the form is not a filed complaint., Civil Code, section 52.1 (the Bane Act) allows an individual to sue for damages if a person or persons interferes by threat, intimidation, or coercion, or attempts to interfere by threat, intimidation, or coercion, with the exercise or enjoyment by any individual or individuals of rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or of the rights secured by the Constitution or laws of this state. (Civ. Specifically, triable issues exist with regard to whether Plaintiff experienced a threat of violence due to McNamara or Josephs actions. Plaintiff also does not contend that the Individual Defendants are business establishments within the meaning of the Unruh Act, or demonstrate how her relationship with any of the defendants would be substantially similar to any of the specific categories outlined in Civil Code section 51.9, other than statements to this effect. Plaintiffs Fifth Cause of Action for Violation of the Bane Act, Civ. Ct.(1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601.)